Friday, November 12, 2010

California Missile Launch: A "Mystery Missile" Conspiracy Theory Circulates

California Missile Launch: A "Mystery Missile" Conspiracy Theory Circulates. The "California Missile Launch" and "mystery missile" have given conspiracy theorists something other than Glenn Beck to discuss. Recently, what appeared to be a missile was seen sailing through the sky around Los Angeles California.

Early reports seemed to suggest a rogue missile. Was it really a missile shot off by a foreign government, or an accident set off by our own military? Perhaps it was a defense contractor trying out an unarmed warhead, or some mad scientist launching off a rocket.

Perhaps more disturbing than the photos and footage itself was that the US government, NORAD, and the military all seemed to deny any knowledge of what the object might be.

In the end, they came up with a seemingly logical explanation - the California missile launch was really a jet contrail. This was a flight from LAX to PHX, and the footage was taken at just the right angle to make the contrail appear to be a missile.

In other words, it was an optical illusion, or the photos suggested an idea that is 'just in our heads.'

So no worries, folks. I mean, come you REALLY think that the government would lie to us about the California missile launch/mystery missile? Ha.


  1. To say a missile/ rocket dosent alter/correct its trajectory,and flies in a straight line is incorrect, they all have guidance systems, if this was a plane what flight was it ? comercial flights are not capable of this type of climb rate, they dont have a flame visible on turbine type engines,its a single contrail not a multi engine comercial plane we are fed a policy of diss info for national security reasons, we will have to wait it seems to know the truth,

  2. To true mark, I'm no expert on missiles but its obvious that its not a jett. I've never seen a contrail look like this from a jett. Oh and as far as I'm aware not even concorde had afterburners quite that visable. Milatary yes, comercial definatly not.

  3. Was it even a missile,why didn't. It land?

  4. Interesting similarity between this and the video taken in China of a supposed missile earlier in the year.

  5. NASA will hold a news conference at 12:30 p.m. EST on Monday, Nov. 15, to discuss the Chandra X-ray Observatory's discovery of an EXCEPTIONAL OBJECT in our cosmic neighborhood... NASA: Sun's Nemesis Pelted Earth with Comets, Study Suggests... National Geographic (November 19, 2008): "MYSTERIOUS ASTROPHYSICAL OBJECTthat's bombarding Earth with cosmic rays:

  6. I have personally observed every single manned American manned launch since the flight of Alan Shepard in 1959. I have seen all Apollo flights to the moon. a hundred unmanned test flights, some of which went badly, the Gemini Flights, the space station launches, and every single Space Shuttle flight. I have viewed them live and in person, for my entire life. Seperate from that I have worked in the airline industry working at an airport. I know the difference between a missle and and airplane. This was a missle. Anyone who grew up on the east central coast of Florida knows it was a missile. The American public is gullible. If you believe this was an airplane, you are part of the problem. We, the American Public, must demand a reasonable explanation.

  7. what about the 4 ufos in the video are you guys blind?

  8. I live here on the Southern California coast. We do not have planes or objects that look like this. It was a missile or something not related to commercial or private jets. The commercial jets have two contrails or if they are spraying chemtrails the lines are very different in our sky. Furthermore, the jets do not spin or change corse in a spiral manner. Finally, Kelly Spear, mentioned in this article was taken back by what she saw. It was different enough that she got her camera. Do we really think a camera man, who flies our skies would bring this back to the station if he felt it was just a plane?

    It is time the media and the government start telling the truth. We deserve to know the truth and make our own choices about our safety. In addition, the media might want to consider who they are reporting for if they cannot be honest and get to the honest truth.

    Finally, the US participated in War Games in early October. Why do we think we are immune to such games?

    Stand for TRUTH!

  9. This was the Bilderberg Group spraying us with chemicals to make us hear voices. Normally they are cloaked using NSA technology but obviously that failed this time. You see these every few months, it was just that this one was picked up by the media.

  10. The most interesting thing about this conspiracy of a theory is the date...

    *Not three years ago on the same day a chinese song class sub bypassed an armada of our ships who were protecting one of our mammoth aircraft carriers "USS Kity Hawk" during a controled war game. How did they get by without detection. Why where they there.
    No doubt because they could.

    I'm not saying that there is undisputable evidence that the chinese launched that missle, but if you don't make the conection and think what might be the reason and choose to believe the half truth that the white house will no doubt later release then you deserve to be knocked on your ass when our fall as a super power arrises!

    ***Link to article Nov 10, 2007***

  11. And rom the Kremlin (or so proported):

    A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared for Prime Minister Putin by Director Anatoly Perminov of the Russian Federal Space Agency states that an Arkon-1 military satellite monitoring the western coastal regions of North America detected an “EMP anomalous event” occurring on November 8th at 0600 Pacific Standard Time (-8 hours GMT) that bore the “direct signature” of a YJ-62 subsonic anti-ship missile fired from a Chinese People’s Liberation Navy Type 041 submarine (NATO code name Yuan-Class) known to be patrolling approximately 200 kilometers off United States coast.

    Nearly 11 hours after this EMP “event”, this report further says, Arkon-1 then detected a BGM-109 (Tomahawk) subsonic cruise missile launched from a US Navy Ohio-Class submarine operating off the coast of California on a “training mission” from its home port located at US Navy’s Kitsap Base in Washington State and was enroute to the largest American Naval Base on the US west coast in San Diego, California.

    Note: A Russian military intelligence (GRU) addendum to this report states that the “training mission” the Ohio-Class submarine was on is related to a new US law passed this year allowing for the first time in history for women to serve on US Navy subs and was an “operational exercise” testing female Naval Officers competence prior to their first “operational deployment”.

    The “immediate effect” of the Chinese Navy’s firing of their EMP missile, this report continues, was the “catastrophic crippling” of the US based cruise ship Carnival Splendor [photo 3rd left] that stranded its nearly 4,500 passengers and crew in a “dead in the water” boat and prompting the Americans to send the US Navy’s Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier, warplanes, and supply aircraft to protect it from further attack after all of its electronic systems were destroyed.

    An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) such as was used upon the Carnival Splendor is a burst of electromagnetic radiation that causes rapidly changing electric fields (or magnetic fields) that when coupling with electrical/electronic systems produces damaging current and voltage surges destroying all non-hardened electrical systems.

    The US Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) had previously warned that American ships were vulnerable to such attacks with EMP Assessment Group Leader of Blaise Corbett stating that “the consequences of failing to take appropriate precautions to protect fleet mission critical systems can ultimately prove catastrophic to the Navy’s mission.”

    The purpose of this Chinese EMP upon an American ship, this report says, was twofold: 1.) A test of the EMP weapon itself that in a war against the Americans and would be used against their Naval Fleet and Marine Forces operating out of California and the west coast of the US, and 2.) A test of the response time for American retaliatory measures against any Chinese warship attacking the US and/or its interests in the Pacific.


Related Posts with Thumbnails